Northwest Mining Ass'n v. Babbitt’s Empirical Analysis
1998
Citation profile
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 9 later decisions — most recently April 2019
1 federal appellate · 2 district · 1 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 15 U.S.C. § 632 · 43 U.S.C. § 1701 (Federal Land Assistance, Management, and Enhancement Act of 2009) · 43 U.S.C. § 1731 · 43 U.S.C. § 1732 · 43 U.S.C. § 1740 · 5 U.S.C. § 551 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 553 (Administrative Procedure Act of 1946) · 5 U.S.C. § 601 (Contract with America Advancement Act of 1996)
Relies on Celotex Corporation v. Catrett H · Warth v. Seldin · Hunt v. Washington State Apple Advertising Commission · Environmental Protection Agency v. National Crushed Stone Ass'n · International Harvester Co. v. Ruckelshaus
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 9 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“), 5 U.S.C. §§ 601-11. They argue that EPA seeks to excuse its noncompliance by falsely certifying that the Rule does not have a significant impact on a substantial number of small entities. 64 Fed. Reg. at 68,800. We are not persuaded. 165 The RFA requires a federal agency to prepare a regulatory flexibility analysis and an assessment of the economic impact of a proposed rule on small business entities, 5 U.S.C. § 604, unless the agency certifies that the proposed rule will not have a”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“a small entity that is adversely affected or aggrieved by final agency action is entitled to judicial review.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority“any not-for-profit enterprise which is independently owned and operated and is not dominant in its field”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.