Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 ILLAPP3D 60 - People v. Kane

People v. Kane’s Empirical Analysis

1972

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
April 1973
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on 44 Ill. 2d 476 - The PEOPLE v. Derengowski · 44 Ill. 2d 82 - The PEOPLE v. Smith · People v. Kane · People v. Ray

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““GeneraUy, the judgment of a reviewing court is res judicata as to aH issues actually raised before that court, as well as to those which could have been raised but were not. Issues of the latter nature wiH be deemed to have been waived unless fundamental fairness requires that they be considered in a later proceeding. People v. Derengowski, 44 Ill.2d 476 , 256 N.E.2d 455 * *”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.