People v. Stringfellow’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
February 1979
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on McMann v. Richardson · Parker v. North Carolina · 41 Ill. 2d 503 - The PEOPLE v. Brown · 41 Ill. 2d 518 - The PEOPLE v. Gendron · 46 Ill. 2d 167 - The PEOPLE v. Olson
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““He further states that his plea resulted from his being informed that he had a had case’ and that he could get a long sentence or the death penalty if he went to trial. His knowledge of the possibility of a long sentence or the death penalty was not an improper inducement for defendant’s guilty plea. (See People v. Brown, supra, at 505-506, 244 N.E.2d at 160). It was the duty of the court and defense counsel to inform defendant of those possibilities to thereby enable him to make an intelligent decision with respect to his plea.” People v. Stringfellow (1972), 5 Ill.App. 3d 944, 947, 284 N.E.2d 496, 498 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majoritye.g. People v. Payne
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.