Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 Ind. 237

House v. House

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1854

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1854-06-09

<p>A party can not object on error that an interested witness was examined at the trial, where the objection was not made at his examination.</p>

Decided 1854-06-09

Per Curiam.

¶1— Proceeding by an administrator to settle an estate and to take an account of advancements. Decree that certain of the heirs had been advanced, &c. The question is upon the weight of the evidence, and we think it fully sustains the finding of the Court.

¶2It is objected that Christian House, a witness proving perhaps more fully than any other the advancement, was interested; but the objection was not made when he was examined, and it is too late to raise it now.

Davison, J., having been concerned as counsel, was absent.

¶3The decree is affirmed with costs.

/5/ind/237 · .json · Public domain