Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 Ind. 240

Talbott v. Rudisill

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided June 9, 1854

Indiana Supreme Court · decided 1854-06-09

<p>A scire facias to revive a judgment is not objectionable for leaving blanks for the costs which had accrued on the judgment.</p>

Decided 1854-06-09

Stuart, J.

¶1Scire facias to revive a judgment which Rudisill had recovered against Talbott. Talbott was defaulted, and judgment of revivor.

¶2The record shows the scire facias and the return of the sheriff that it had been, duly served.

J. M. Hanna, for the plaintiff.

¶3The blanks in the scire facias and judgment are only as to costs, -which the clerk could at any time fill after the costs were taxed.

¶4We can not discover any substantial grounds of objection to these proceedings.

¶5Per Curiam. — The judgment is affirmed, with, 5 per cent, damages and costs.

/5/ind/240 · .json · Public domain