Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 INDAPP 33 - Richter v. Meyers

Richter v. Meyers’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
5
states following
June 1931
most recently cited

21 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently June 1931

21 state decisions

8018921900191019201930decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Hines v. Driver · Bowman v. Clemmer · Hadley v. Prather · Dunn v. Johnson · Fairfield v. Jeffreys

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “There are cases in which great injustice might result, however, if a party should be denied the benefit of newly-discovered evidence, but in all such cases the applicant must make out a clear case of diligence, and show particularly that he made all reasonable efforts to discover the evidence before the trial, or he will be denied relief.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.