Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 Ind. App. 4 - Starnes v. Schofield

5 Ind. App. 4 - Starnes v. Schofield’s Empirical Analysis

1892

Citation profile

21
cited by 21 later decisions
4
states following
May 1985
most recently cited

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 21 later decisions — most recently May 1985

2 federal appellate · 19 state decisions

601892190019101920193019401950196019701980decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Landwerlen v. Wheeler · Childress v. Callender · Reynolds v. Baldwin · Harvey v. Baldwin · Silver v. Parr

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 21 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““* * * Unless the amount of the attorney’s fees is specified in the note, before the holder can recover, he' is required to prove- what a reasonable fee would be to make' the collection; and his recovery will be measured accordingly.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.