Balz v. Benninghof’s Empirical Analysis
1892
Citation profile
8 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 8 later decisions — most recently June 1987
8 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Hutchinson v. Trauerman · Taylor v. Johnson · Cushman v. Gephart · Dillman v. Dillman · Fowler v. Griffin
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The affidavit, which alleged that an execution had issued and was then in the hands of the sheriff, can not be resorted to for the purpose of supplying the proof. Facts are to be established in the trial of such proceedings in the same manner as in other civil actions. . . .” Balz v. Benninghof (1892), 5 Ind. App. 522, 525 , 32 N. E. 595 .”
1 later decision quote this exact passage““Pleadings sworn to by either party in any case shall not, on the trial, be deemed proof of the facts alleged therein ...” § 2-1029, Burns’ 1933.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.