Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 Johns. 353

Taft v. Grosfent

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 15, 1810

New York Supreme Court · decided 1810-02-15

IN error, on certiorari. Grosfent brought an action against Taft, before a justice, and after issue joined between the parties, the justice adjourned the trial of the cause until 10 o’clock in the forenoon of the 21st November• Taft appeared at the hour and place appointed, and being told that the justice could not come until 12, waited near three hours, and finding the justice did not attend, he went away ; and afterwards, just before one o’clock P. M. the justice came, and…

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1810-02-15

How this case has been cited

Cited by 3 later decisions — most recently October 1906

3 state decisions

101810182018301840185018601870188018901900decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Per Curiam.

¶1The defendant below waited a reasonable time, and the cause became discontinued by the delay of the justice to attend; for it was an unreasonable delay. The defendant below, during the three hours he waited, was told, that the justice had said he could not come until lx o’clock, and he waited near an hour after that time. The judgment below must be reversed.

¶2Judgment reversed.

/5/johns/353 · .json · Public domain