Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 KAN 141 - Stark v. Chitwood

Stark v. Chitwood’s Empirical Analysis

1869

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
2
states following
April 1960
most recently cited

6 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently April 1960

6 state decisions

3018691870188018901900191019201930194019501960decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Again, this action cannot be maintained without showing malice, and want of probable cause. If what the defendant did was in pursuance of a bona fide claim which he was asserting honestly, and especially if he was acting under the advice of counsel, though without rigiht, he will not be liable.” (Stark v. Chitwood, 5 Kan. 141 , at pages 144-5.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.