5 Kan. App. 2d 144 - State v. Haynes’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
8
cited by 8 later decisions
1
states following
October 1984
most recently cited
8 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on In Re the Attorney General, Stephan · State v. Luginbill · State v. Osburn · State v. Wheeler · 2 Kan. App. 2d 115 - State v. Kleber
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 8 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““The defendant is not guilty of a sale of_if the defendant acted only as a procuring agent for the purchaser. A procuring agent for the purchaser is a person who, by agreement with the purchaser, buys or procures an article or a substance from a third party at the request of and for the purchaser. The agreement may be written, oral or implied by the behavior of the parties. “The defendant is not a procuring agent if the defendant acted as a seller or as an agent for a seller.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Brown
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.