5 Kan. App. 2d 240 - Darnall v. Lowe’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
17 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 17 later decisions — most recently July 2021
17 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 79 Cal. App. 3d 325 - Hyatt v. Sierra Boat Co. · Neagle v. Brooks · Pinkerton v. Schwiethale · 83 Cal. App. 3d 110 - Lemos v. Eichel · Brown v. Triple "D" Drilling Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 17 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
““We first consider the question whether a trial court has jurisdiction to correct or modify a judgment under K.S.A. 60-260 after an appeal has been docketed at the appellate level and without notice to the parties. . . . “First, Wichita City Teachers Credit Union v. Rider, 203 Kan. 552, 556 , 456 P.2d 42 (1969), instructs that a trial court may reexamine its rulings within the time period allotted by K.S.A. 60-260, provided it does so prior to the time the appeal is docketed at the appellate level. Here, the appeal had been docketed in the Court of Appeals prior to the judgment’s having been modified as a result of a mistake of law, and the trial judge had lost jurisdiction. See also Neagle v. Brooks, 203 Kan. 323, 328 , 454 P.2d 544 (1969); In re Estate of Corson, 226 Kan. 673 , 602 P.2d 1320 (1979).””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““K.S.A. 1979 Supp. 60-2006 was enacted after the comparative negligence statute and contains no language to indicate that the legislature intended that the award should be reduced to reflect degree of fault. The trial court did not err in refusing to assess defendant only 40 percent of the attorney fees.””
1 later decision quote this exact passage““K.S.A. 60-260(b) does not permit a district court to grant relief from a judgment or order on its own initiative, but requires that a motion be filed and that a notice of hearing be given to all parties who would be affected thereby.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Daniels v. Chaffee
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.