Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 Kan. App. 2d 371 - State v. Boling

5 Kan. App. 2d 371 - State v. Boling’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

27
cited by 27 later decisions
2
states following
June 2024
most recently cited

27 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently June 2024 · most notably State v. Newman (1984), State v. Griffin (1990)

27 state decisions

14019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on In Re the Attorney General, Stephan · State v. Bly · State v. Quick · Arredondo v. Duckwall Stores, Inc. · Connell v. State Highway Commission

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Interlocutory appeals by the state. When a judge of the district court, prior to the commencement of trial of a criminal action, makes an order quashing a warrant or a search warrant, suppressing evidence or suppressing a confession or admission an appeal may be taken by the prosecution from such order if notice of appeal is filed within ten (10) days after entry of the order. Further proceedings in the trial court shall be stayed pending determination of the appeal.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    7 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “'The foregoing sections are intended to permit Supreme Court review of trial court rulings on pretrial motions which may be determinative of the case. The committee believed that in the case of trial court rulings which suppress evidence essential to proof of a prima facie case, the prosecution should have an opportunity for review in the Supreme Court if a substantial question exists as to the correctness of the trial court's decision.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “'[i]t is the duty of an appellate court on its own motion to raise the question of its jurisdiction, and when the record discloses a lack of jurisdiction it must dismiss the appeal.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.