5 Kan. App. 2d 558 - Tanner v. Hancock’s Empirical Analysis
1980
Citation profile
11 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 11 later decisions — most recently August 2014
11 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Applies 28 U.S.C. § 1963
Relies on Landrum v. Taylor · National Equipment Rental, Ltd. v. Taylor · 3 Kan. App. 2d 298 - Alexander Construction Co. v. Weaver · Corning Truck & Radiator Service v. J. W. M., Inc. · Fischer v. Kipp
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 11 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“" ‘[A] properly authenticated judgment rendered by a court of one state is, under the full faith and credit clause of the United States Constitution, Article 4, Section 1, entitled in the courts of another state to the force, the effect, and the full faith and credit it has by law in the state where the judgment was rendered.’ ””
1 later decision quote this exact passage“The underlying Kansas judgment upon which the Missouri judgment was based simply cannot be ignored. A “foreign judgment” registered under the Missouri provisions shall not be considered a “foreign judgment” that can subsequently be registered in Kansas ... as such is not within the spirit or the intent of the act.”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.