Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 Kan. App. 2d 754 - State v. Warren

5 Kan. App. 2d 754 - State v. Warren’s Empirical Analysis

1981

Citation profile

20
cited by 20 later decisions
3
states following
October 2005
most recently cited

20 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 20 later decisions — most recently October 2005

20 state decisions

80198119902000decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on White v. Morgan · State v. Gregory · State v. Clark · State v. Stokes · State v. Weyer

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 20 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Involuntary manslaughter under K.S.A. 21-3404 requires an unintentional ‘killing.’ A defendant may be convicted of involuntary manslaughter for an intentional shooting if it is found that the killing of the victim was unintentional.” Syl. ¶ 3. “Deliberately shooting a person with intent to injure, unless justified, is at least a felonious aggravated battery under K.S.A. 21-3414. As such, it cannot be an ‘unlawful act not amounting to a felony’ under the involuntary manslaughter statute (K.S.A. 21-3404) even if the shooting occurs in a city where the discharge of firearms violates a city ordinance.” Syl. ¶ 4.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. ““One fending off an attack does not have a reckless disregard’ or a ‘indifference and unconcern’ over consequences to the attacker — the victim intends to inflict injury on the attacker, and is legally justified in harboring that intent. Where self-defense is found to exist, the only element which would render the victim’s conduct criminal is the use of excessive force, not the victim’s state of mind.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.