¶1The judgment of the court was pronounced by
¶2The defendant is sued as surety on an administrator’s bond; there was judgment against him, and he appealed.
¶3The defence is a general denial, and an allegation that the conditions of the bond have not been violated.
¶4The plaintiff obtained a judgment against the administrator; but no execution had issued upon it when the petition in this case was filed. Before the filing of the answer, however, execution issued and was returned: no property found.
¶5The defendant now contends, that as the breach of the bond was not ascertained in a legal manner, when the petition was filed, the action was premature and cannot be maintained.
¶6We are of opinion, that this exception, if at all tenable, should have been pleaded in limine litis; and that by answering to the merits, after the execution had been returned, the defendant must be considered as having waived this ground of defence. The plaintiff has asked damages as for a frivolous appeal; we do not consider this a case in which they should-be allowed.
¶7Judgment affirmed, with costs.