Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 Md. App. 469 - Burley v. State

5 Md. App. 469 - Burley v. State’s Empirical Analysis

1968

Citation profile

36
cited by 36 later decisions
1
states following
September 1991
most recently cited

36 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 36 later decisions — most recently September 1991 · most notably State v. Foster (1971), 11 Md. App. 555 - Polisher v. State (1971)

36 state decisions

2801968197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Nugent · Lunn v. F. W. Woolworth Co. · Watson v. State · Lusby v. State · 3 Md. App. 11 - Boone v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 36 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““[T]he generally accepted test as to whether a witness is an accomplice is whether he himself could be convicted for the offense, either as a principal or accessory before the fact.””
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. ““With respect to the procedure to determine complicity, we recited that the burden of proving a witness was an accomplice rested upon the accused asserting it, although the proof need only be by the preponderance of the evidence to the satisfaction of the trier of the facts. The function of the Court of Special Appeals on appeal is a matter of the sufficiency of the evidence.” (emphasis supplied).”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. ““* * * When the evidence relating to whether or not a witness is an accomplice is capable of being determined either way and justifies different inferences in respect thereto, the question is for the determination of the trier of fact and in a jury case should be submitted to the jury with proper instructions.” (Emphasis supplied.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.