5 Mich. 241
Decided May 11, 1858
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1858-05-11
<p>It is not necessary, on appeal in Chancery, that any written claim of appeal should be filed.</p> <p>It is not necessary that a bond given on appeal in Chancery should be executed by all the appellants. It is sufficient if it appear to be executed on behalf of all.</p> <p>Motions to dismiss must be made at the earliest opportunity.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently October 1899
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1858-05-11
View the full empirical analysis of this case →
¶1We think it sufficient that the bond is executed on behalf of both appellants.
¶2For another reason we should not be inclined to entertain this motion. The transcript on appeal was filed in August last, and two terms of Court have since elapsed without this motion being made. In such cases, the party must make his application at the earliest opportunity.
¶3Motion denied.