¶1The Coubt held that, in all cases of special motions, notice must be given if the opposite party has appeared in the cause. A plaintiff in error is always in court, and always entitled to notice. Where he does not prosecute his writ by attorney, he is entitled to have notice served upon himself in the manner provided by the Rules. Defendant in error is only entitled to such notice after having appeared.
5 Mich. 283
Scribner v. Doseman
Decided July 9, 1858
Michigan Supreme Court · decided 1858-07-09
<p>Notice of special motions is in all cases necessary -where the opposite party has apt peered in the cause.</p>
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently March 1886
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1858-07-09
View the full empirical analysis of this case →