Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 MO 233 - Montgomery v. Farley

Montgomery v. Farley’s Empirical Analysis

1838

Citation profile

4
cited by 4 later decisions
1
states following
December 2012
most recently cited

4 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently December 2012

4 state decisions

201838184018501860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 4 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““The records of a judgment offered in evidence in another suit cannot be invalidated by parol testimony, or matter in pais.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.