¶1From Caswell. After the answer to an injunction bill has been filed, the bill cannot be amended before the hearing, particularly, if no previous notice of the amendment be given to the defendants. To permit such amendment would introduce improper delays in injunction causes, and other mischiefs which ought to be avoided. Nor will the Court permit the complainant to support his bill by affidavits of other persons. It has been the constant practice of the Court to decide injunction causes upon the bill and answer; and although, in some instances, this practice may produce an injury to a complainant, (192) it has been found to be salutary. The defendant has a judgment at law, and if he swears away the equity of complainant's bill, the injunction must be dissolved and the law take its course. *152
5 N.C. 191
West v. . Coke
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 5, 1808
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1808-07-05
Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently July 1801
1 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1808-07-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →