¶1We are of opinion, that a posthumous child is entitled under our statutes of distributions to a distributive share; ánd that Mary Paris Moore was entitled to a share of Julius Moore’s estate equally with the brothers and sisters of saicl Julius, who were living at the time of his death and capable of taking.
5 N.C. 233
Hill v. Moore
Supreme Court of North Carolina
Decided July 15, 1809
Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1809-07-15
<p>\ posthumous child, is entitled to a distributive share under the statute of distributions.</p>
Cited by 2 later decisions — most recently June 1980
2 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1809-07-15
View the full empirical analysis of this case →