Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 N.C. 95

Bell v. Bell

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided December 15, 1805

Supreme Court of North Carolina · decided 1805-12-15

<p>abatement pialntíffhre-the Georgia, & defendant ¿e”district of°^eJu1^™ not tó^be to answer Fayetteville co“he ^uedutimt l°¿d beneficial interest in the that he re-Fayetteville a‘3triet' ■fiie ddeii* red to tins -Km-e?overruled</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently October 1794

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1805-12-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Bx macax, taxioR and iocke — Judge

¶1Let the demurrer be overruled with costs.

Hall—Judge

¶2Bell is the plaintiff of record, and the act of 1777, ch. 2, directs that “ where the plaintiff shall reside beyond seas, or in a different state, the ¿hit shall be brought to the court of the district where the *96defendant resides, and where suit is brought otherwise than is therein directed, it may be abated, on the jilea of the do Pendant.” A court of law will not take notice of. the trust between Anthony Bell and Joshua Bell, and recognize tin-latter as plaintiff when the record declares that the former jg plaintiff

/5/nc/95 · .json · Public domain