Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 N.C. App. 528 - State v. Bumper

5 N.C. App. 528 - State v. Bumper’s Empirical Analysis

1969

Citation profile

12
cited by 12 later decisions
2
states following
September 2015
most recently cited

2 district · 10 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 12 later decisions — most recently September 2015

2 district · 10 state decisions

40196919701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Simmons v. United States · Bumper v. North Carolina · Bennett v. United States · State v. Brooks · State v. Bumpers

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 12 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “'the essential thing in the requirement of correspondence between the allegation of the name of the woman transported and the proof is that the record be in such shape as to inform the defendant of the charge against her and to protect her against another prosecution for the same offense.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “'[d]efendant was indicted for having caused the transportation of Opal Clarke; and ... the testimony showed that her correct name was Jeanette, but that she had gone by the names of Opal and Nellie, her real name, however, being Jeanette Laplante.'”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. “[t]he record of defendant's trial clearly show[ed] that Monty Jones and Manson Marvin Jones, Jr., are one and the same person[,]”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.