Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 NEB 491 - Struthers v. McDowell

Struthers v. McDowell’s Empirical Analysis

1877

Citation profile

6
cited by 6 later decisions
3
states following
November 1958
most recently cited

1 district · 5 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 6 later decisions — most recently November 1958

1 district · 5 state decisions

30187718801890190019101920193019401950decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Under our statute of amendments great latitude is given to the court in permitting even material defects to be remedied, especially where they were occasioned by mistake, or are the result of oversight, and it can be seen that by so doing, substantial justice will be done. And this rule is not limited to pleading merely, but is applicable to all proceedings in civil actions.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.