Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 N.J. 240 - Winberry v. Salisbury

Winberry v. Salisbury’s Empirical Analysis

1950

Citation profile

339
cited by 339 later decisions
4
states following
August 2024
most recently cited

3 federal appellate · 28 district · 299 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 339 later decisions — most recently August 2024 · most notably Busik v. Levine (1973), Cogdell v. Hospital Center at Orange (1989)

3 federal appellate · 28 district · 299 state decisions

73019501960197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Osborn v. President Directors and Company of the Bank of the United States · City of Newark v. Fischer · Massett Building Co. v. Bennett · Mulhearn v. Federal Shipbuilding and Dry Dock Co. · John S. Westervelt's Sons v. Regency, Inc.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 339 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[c]omplete power and responsibility in the judiciary are concepts quite inconsistent with the notions of overriding legislation.”
    13 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  2. “The Supreme Court shall make rules governing the administration of all courts in the State and, subject to law, the practice and procedure in all such courts.”
    8 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority
  3. “This order was consented to by the attorneys for each party and it is therefore not appealable.”
    4 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the majority

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.