Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 N.J. Super. 222 - State v. Dietz

5 N.J. Super. 222 - State v. Dietz’s Empirical Analysis

1949

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 1965
most recently cited

14 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on State v. Raymond · Bullock v. State · State v. Donato · State v. Bloom

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “In a criminal trial, considering the serious potentialities of a conviction, a defendant should not be required to contend with inadmissible evidence, where it appears that it may have a prejudicial effect upon a court or jury.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““It is obvious from the testimony of the police officer that the statement was not signed by the defendant, nor was it read over to- or by him. In addition, so far as revealed by the record, the first time that the statement was read in the presence of defendant was-at his trial, when he denied that part dealing with his being sexually maladjusted.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  3. ““Under authority of State v. Donato, supra, it was error for the court to admit the statement as a confession.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.