5 N.J. Super. 222 - State v. Dietz’s Empirical Analysis
1949
Citation profile
14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
June 1965
most recently cited
14 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on State v. Raymond · Bullock v. State · State v. Donato · State v. Bloom
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“In a criminal trial, considering the serious potentialities of a conviction, a defendant should not be required to contend with inadmissible evidence, where it appears that it may have a prejudicial effect upon a court or jury.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passage““It is obvious from the testimony of the police officer that the statement was not signed by the defendant, nor was it read over to- or by him. In addition, so far as revealed by the record, the first time that the statement was read in the presence of defendant was-at his trial, when he denied that part dealing with his being sexually maladjusted.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cleveland““Under authority of State v. Donato, supra, it was error for the court to admit the statement as a confession.””
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Cleveland
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.