Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 NY2D 156 - Parker v. Borock

Parker v. Borock’s Empirical Analysis

1959

Citation profile

125
cited by 125 later decisions
7
states following
June 1998
most recently cited

32 federal appellate · 6 district · 33 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 125 later decisions — most recently June 1998 · most notably Quinn v. Syracuse Model Neighborhood Corp. (1980), Olga Zdanok v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division, Frank T. Alexander v. The Glidden Company, Durkee Famous Foods Division (1964)

32 federal appellate · 6 district · 33 state decisions

64019591960197019801990decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Conley v. Gibson · Barth v. Addie Company · Donato v. American Locomotive Co.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 125 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Accordingly, absent specific language giving the employee the right to act on his own behalf, it is my conclusion that, under a collective bargaining agreement such as the one before us — which contains provision for the submission of unsettled disputes to arbitration — the union alone has a right to control the prosecution of discharge cases.””
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. ““The clause in this labor contract that no regular employee shall be discharged or disciplined without good and sufficient cause, is not equivalent to providing term employment for each employee until the expiration of the collective bargaining agreement.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.