Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 Ohio App. 2d 122 - State v. Terry

5 Ohio App. 2d 122 - State v. Terry’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

55
cited by 55 later decisions
2
cited 2 times by the Supreme Court
11
states following
May 2025
most recently cited

6 federal appellate · 43 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 55 later decisions (2 by the Supreme Court) — most recently May 2025 · most notably Terry v. Ohio (1968), State v. Barker (1978)

6 federal appellate · 43 state decisions — followed in 11 states

1501966197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Wong Sun v. United States · Carroll v. United States · Mapp v. Ohio · Brinegar v. United States · Beck v. State of Ohio

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 55 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “(1) [a]n intent to arrest, (2) under a real or pretended authority, (3) accompanied by an actual or constructive seizure or detention of the person, * * * (4) which is so understood by the person arrested.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. State v. Ransom, Unpublished Decision (12-11-2006) · State v. Deer, L-06-1086 (4-20-2007)
  2. ““A policeman may, under appropriate circumstances, reasonably inquire of a person concerning such person’s suspicious on-the-street behavior. The stopping and questioning of a suspicious person does not violate the Fourth Amendment to the United States Constitution and does not constitute an arrest in the technical criminal-law sense. A required element of an arrest is the intent of the officer to make an arrest(Emphasis added.)”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage · from the concurrence
    e.g. 35 Ohio App. 2d 15 - State v. Gaddis · 33 Ohio App. 2d 167 - State v. Kratzer

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.