Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 Ohio App. 3d 217 - State v. Gasser

5 Ohio App. 3d 217 - State v. Gasser’s Empirical Analysis

1980

Citation profile

25
cited by 25 later decisions
1
states following
October 2013
most recently cited

23 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 25 later decisions — most recently October 2013 · most notably 23 Ohio App. 3d 79 - City of Fairfield v. Regner (1985), 138 Ohio App. 3d 562 - State v. Siegel (2000)

23 state decisions

1201980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on Lego v. Twomey · City of Mentor v. Giordano · City of Cincinnati v. Sand · State v. Kassow · 60 Ohio St. 2d 73 - City of Aurora v. Kepley

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 25 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “[t]he state has the burden to establish that the test was done in accordance with established law to the extent the defendant takes issue with its legality.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Jones · State v. Mausling, Unpublished Decision (3-17-2006)
  2. “"Such bodily substance shall be analyzed in accordance with methods approved by the director of health * *”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Jones · 88 Ohio App. 3d 486 - State v. Young
  3. “The state, as well as having the ultimate burden of proof or persuasion, has at a hearing of a pretrial motion to suppress the results of a blood alcohol test the burden of going forward with the evidence to prove that it has complied with each foundation requirement that the defendant has set forth in his motion to suppress as not having been fulfilled.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
    e.g. State v. Jones

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.