5 Ohio App. 3d 94 - Thomas v. Thomas’s Empirical Analysis
1982
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 39 later decisions — most recently June 2022 · most notably Singer Singer v. F Singer, 18 Mass. App. Ct. 85 - Dominick v. Dominick (1984)
3 federal appellate · 30 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on Cherry v. Cherry · Wolfe v. Wolfe · Spercel v. Sterling Industries, Inc. · Main Line Theatres, Inc. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corporation, Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp., Rko Radio Pictures, Universal Film Exchanges, Inc., Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation, Columbia Pictures Corporation, Loew's Incorporated, United Artists Corporation, and Allied Artists Distributing Corp. 309 Drive-In Corp. v. Paramount Film Distributing Corporation, Warner Bros. Pictures Distributing Corp., Universal Film Exchanges, Inc., Twentieth Century-Fox Film Corporation, Columbia Pictures Corporation, Loew's Incorporated, United Artists Corporation, Buena Vista Film Distributing Corp., Allied Artists Distributing Corp · 25 Ohio App. 2d 98 - Holland v. Holland
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 39 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“settlement stipulation incorporating essentially all of his demands, he should not be permitted to contend that the court in approving and adopting the bargain he struck has acted so unfairly as to constitute an abuse of discretion as a matter of law'”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“R.C. 3105.18 directs the procedures to be followed by the trial courts in contested proceedings and is not applicable to uncontested proceedings where the parties have stipulated an 'in-court' settlement.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Rohlman v. Rohlman“We find that the Statute of Frauds has no application to an 'in-court' settlement stipulation nor to the order of a court * * *.”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Wilson v. Wilson
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.