Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 OHIOST2D 233 - Porter v. Fenner

Porter v. Fenner’s Empirical Analysis

1966

Citation profile

14
cited by 14 later decisions
1
states following
August 2022
most recently cited

14 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 14 later decisions — most recently August 2022

14 state decisions

501966197019801990200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on 154 Ohio St. 177 - Peters v. Moore · 107 Ohio St. (N.S.) 577 - Vance v. Davis · 154 Ohio St. 184 - Bynner v. Jones

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 14 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Remedial statutes and the proceedings thereunder are to be liberally construed, and no person should be denied the assertion of a cause of action on captious or purely technical grounds.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “11 Remedial laws and all proceedings under them shall be liberally construed in order to promote their object and assist the parties in obtaining justice. * * *” (Emphasis added.)”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.