Pencheff v. Adams’s Empirical Analysis
1983
Citation profile
3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
How this case has been cited
Cited by 27 later decisions — most recently March 2012 · most notably 20 Ohio App. 3d 127 - Bell v. Le-Ge, Inc. (1985), 144 Ohio App. 3d 89 - Boland v. Hammond (2001)
3 federal appellate · 16 state decisions
Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.
Relationships
Relies on 16 Ohio St. 2d 35 - Bronaugh v. R. & E. Dredging Co.
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 27 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“the purpose behind the violated provision ... is to prevent those persons willing to market worthless or unnecessary risky securities from soliciting to the public without first subjecting themselves and their securities to reasonable licensing and registration requirements designed to protect the public from its own stupidity, gullibility and avariciousness ... Any contrary determination would only serve to undermine the most fundamental purpose of the statute-protection of the public from unregistered securities.”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage“(1) Is not exempt under section 1707.02 of the Revised Code, nor the subject matter of one of the transactions exempted in section 1707.03 , 1707.04 , or 1707.34 of the Revised Code, has not been registered by coordination or qualification, and is not the subject matter of a transaction that has been registered by description;”
2 later decisions quote this exact passage““Every sale or contract for sale made in violation of Chapter 1707. of the Revised Code, is voidable at the election of the purchaser. The person making such sale or contract for sale, and every person who has participated in or aided the seller in any way in making such sale or contract for sale, are jointly and severally liable to such purchaser, in an action at law in any court of competent jurisdiction, upon tender to the seller in person or in open court of the securities sold or of the contract made, for the full amount paid by such purchaser and for all taxable court costs, unless the court determines that the violation did not materially affect the protection contemplated by the violated provision.” (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passage
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.