State v. Huffmeyer’s Empirical Analysis
2000
Citation profile
3 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 120 Wash. 2d 585 - State v. Greenwood · 87 Wash. 2d 870 - State v. Striker · 107 Wash. 2d 59 - State v. Pacheco · 121 Wash. 2d 852 - State v. Anderson · 94 Wash. 2d 690 - State v. Carpenter
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“[W]here a long and unnecessary delay occurs in bringing a defendant who is amenable to process before the court, CrR 3.3's 90-day trial period is deemed to commence at the time the information was filed....”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Huffmeyer“`failed to put forth any argument that it acted in good faith and with due diligence'”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Huffmeyer“began on the day the defendant pleaded guilty to the assault charge,”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. State v. Huffmeyer
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.