Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 P.3d 741 - State v. Kane

State v. Kane’s Empirical Analysis

2000

Citation profile

40
cited by 40 later decisions
5
states following
May 2021
most recently cited

40 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 40 later decisions — most recently May 2021 · most notably 31 Cal. 4th 179 - People v. Floyd (2003), State v. Pillatos (2007)

40 state decisions

290200020102020decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Batchelder · 63 Cal. 2d 740 - In Re Estrada · United States v. Batchelder · Warden Lewisburg Penitentiary v. Marrero · Barakat v. Life Insurance

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 40 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “Whenever any criminal or penal statute shall be amended or repealed, all offenses committed or penalties or forfeitures incurred while it was in force shall be punished or enforced as if it were in force, notwithstanding such amendment or repeal, unless a contrary intention is expressly declared in the amendatory or repealing act, and every such amendatory or repealing statute shall be so construed as to save all criminal and penal proceedings, and proceedings to recover forfeitures, pending at the time of its enactment, unless a contrary intention is expressly declared therein.”
    3 later decisions quote this exact passage
  2. “[a]ny sentence imposed under this chapter shall be determined in accordance with the law in effect when the current offense was committed.”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage
  3. “such intent need only be expressed in `words that fairly convey that intention.'”
    2 later decisions quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.