Dydo v. Commonwealth’s Empirical Analysis
1972
Citation profile
2 state decisions
Relationships
Applies 45 U.S.C. § 51 (Federal Employers' Liability Act) · 5 U.S.C. § 8101 (Attendant Allowance Adjustment Act)
Relies on M'Culloch v. State of Maryland · Johnson v. State of Maryland · Posey v. Tennessee Valley Authority · 205 Pa. Super. 117 - Herman v. Kandrat Coal Co. · Breeding v. Tennessee Valley Authority
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“The term ‘employe,’ as used in this act, is declared to be synonymous with servant, and includes all natural persons who perform services . . . for another for a valuable consideration. . . . (Emphasis added.)”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Commonwealth v. Bley
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.