¶1filed the following opinion:
¶2The matter of the motion of Adolph J. Lachman, praying that the writs of attachment in this cause, levied upon certain properties as in the writs described, be vacated and set aside, comes on to be heard. M. Rodriguez Serra appears for the motion and Edward S. Paine against the same, and it appearing to the court, after hearing said counsel, that the said mover requests the vacating of the writs of attachment on the ground that the property upon which they were levied has, since said date, been adjudicated to him under his prior mortgage, by an insular court, under the summary process provided for by art. 128 and other articles of the mortgage law of Porto Rico, and that therefore all remaining debts and liens should be considered as canceled under the second clause of art. 125 of said mortgage law; but the court, being of opinion that summary process under the mortgage law, by which property mentioned in a mortgage is “adjudicated” to the mortgagee, is probably not due process of law, and that therefore junior liens are not of necessity shut out, or, at least, that the person seeking the canceling of such junior liens should be forced to bring an affirmative action in that behalf, therefore the motion will be, and it hereby is, denied.