¶1I concur in the order of the Court. In my judgment, however, the motion for a non-suit should have prevailed. This is admitted in the opinion, which declares that the plaintiffs *477should have been non-suited. If the testimony was not suffieient to go to the jury, in my view of the case, the appellant had a right to claim a non-suit.
5 S.C. 474
Willis v. Knox
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided February 5, 1875
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1875-02-05
Before GRAHAM, J., at Charleston, February Term, 1874. This was an action by George Willis, and Caroline, his wife, against Alexander K. Knox. The complaint alleged: 1.
Cited by 4 later decisions — most recently March 1883
4 state decisions
Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know
Decided 1875-02-05
View the full empirical analysis of this case →