¶1This is a bill filed on behalf of the distributees of Lewis Mitchell’s estate, against Lewis Conner, the administrator, and the securities in the administration bond. Conner left the state after the bill was filed, without: answering it. The other defendants, securities in the adminis-ratio A bond, have answered the bill, and insist that they cannot be made liable, or a bill be sustained against them, until a decree should be made against the administrator. The circuit; court dismissed the bill against the securities. This decision is in conformity with the decided cases in this court. It is.founded in reason and justice.' The securities are liable only* on the. failure of the administrator to account and to pay: when, that default and its extent is judicially established, then the sureties may b.e pursued and made responsible. That has not been done in this case; consequently the bill against the sureties was properly dismissed. It is ordered and adjudged that the decrea of. the circuit court be affirmed.
5 S.C. Eq. 267
Glenn v. Conner
Court of Appeals of South Carolina
Decided December 15, 1824
Court of Appeals of South Carolina · decided 1824-12-15
This was a bill filed on behalf of the distributees of Lewis .Mitchell’s estate, against Lewis Conner, the administrator, who had left the state, and the sureties of his administration bond.
Decided 1824-12-15