¶1The only ground for a new trial in this case, is, that the prosecutor gave the first blow, and that the defendant struck in self-defence. Proof that the prosecutor was the aggressor, would not justify an enormous battery; nor, indeed, any, beyond the bounds of self-defence. On both points, there seems to be some doubt as to the facts in this case; it was, therefore, a proper case for the jury ; and although the defendant has not been guilty of a very great offence, he is not entitled to a new trial.
5 S.C.L. 515
State v. Quin
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided January 15, 1815
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1815-01-15
<p>Proof that the prosecutor struck the first blow, will not justify an enormous battery.</p>
Decided 1815-01-15