¶1The duties of clerk of Common Pleas and Sessions, having been invariably performed by one and the same person, in all parts of the State, except Charleston, and even there for many years past, I conceive that the judge was authorized by the act of 21st of December, 1799, to make the appointment. For although the clause speaks of the clerks of the Courts of Common Pleas, it unquestionably uses that language to distinguish them from the county courts just then abolished. But I am inclined to think that in cases of exigency, a judge may appoint pro tempore without any act of the legislature. I am against the motion.
5 S.C.L. 557
State v. Trull
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Decided April 15, 1816
Supreme Court of South Carolina · decided 1816-04-15
Indictment for larcepy. This' bill was found by the grand jury during the present term, and a motion was submitted to set aside the finding, on the ground, that the grand jury had not been duly impannelled and sworn. The facts on which this motion was made, were as follows. The former clerk of the court had resigned, and the vacancy had been filled.
Decided 1816-04-15