Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 SO2D 656 - Vignes v. Barbarra

Vignes v. Barbarra’s Empirical Analysis

1942

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
1
states following
March 1979
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on Brodtman v. Finerty · Harris v. Tennis · Moore v. Aughey · Yates v. Tessier · Herbert v. Herrlitz

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““. . . It is true, of course, that by Article 2716 of the Civil Code it is required that certain repairs be made by the lessee, and we think it is also true that such things as hammock hooks, porch or swing hooks, etc., should be properly included among those things, and that they are contemplated by the last paragraph of the article, which places among the repairs to be made at the expense of the defendant, those ‘To windows, shutters, partitions, shop windows, locks and hinges, and everything of that kind, according to the custom of the place.’ ””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.