Morris v. Morris’s Empirical Analysis
2008
Citation profile
6
cited by 6 later decisions
1
states following
November 2014
most recently cited
6 state decisions
Relationships
Relies on 639 So. 2d 921 - Ferguson v. Ferguson · 437 So. 2d 1003 - Albright v. Albright · 639 So. 2d 909 - Hemsley v. Hemsley · 650 So. 2d 1281 - Johnson v. Johnson · Sellers v. Sellers
Most-quoted passages
The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 6 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.
“(1) contribution to the accumulation of property, (2) prior disposition of or distribution of assets, (3) market and emotional value of assets subject to distribution, (4) the value of non-marital assets, (5) taxes and other economic consequences of the proposed distribution, (6) the extent to which property division can eliminate the need for alimony, (7) the needs of the parties, and (8) any other equitable factors.”
3 later decisions quote this exact passagee.g. Segree v. Segree · Stout v. Stout“title is no longer determinative in deciding a party’s rights to the property.”); Carrow v. Carrow, 642 So.2d 901, 906 (Miss.1994) (Chancellors must”
1 later decision quote this exact passagee.g. Harmon v. Harmon
How this case has been treated — in progress
Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.