Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 SO3D 702 - State v. Dorsey

State v. Dorsey’s Empirical Analysis

2009

Citation profile

2
cited by 2 later decisions
1
states following
June 2017
most recently cited

2 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on United States v. Wade · Neil v. Biggers · Manson v. Brathwaite · 520 So. 2d 250 - State v. Pettis · Rimmer v. State

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 2 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““the prior opportunity the witness had to observe the alleged criminal act; the existence of any discrepancy between any pretrial lineup description and the defendant’s actual description; any identification prior to the lineup of another person; any identification by picture of the defendant prior to the lineup; failure to identify the defendant on a prior occasion; any time lapse between the alleged act and the lineup identification; and any other factors raised by the totality of the circumstances that bear upon the likelihood that the witness’ in-court identification is not tainted by the illegal lineup.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.