5 Tenn.
Volume 5 — Tennessee Reports
116 opinions
- 5 Tenn. 1Sarah Conway v. Hugh D. Hale (1817)
<p>[.Husband and Wife. — Husband Trustee^</p>
- 5 Tenn. 4Click v. Gillespie and Elizabeth Jones (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 5Click v. Jones (1817)
<p>[_Mistake of Oourisel.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 9Robert Young v. Forgey and Henderson (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 10Young v. Forgey (1817)
<p>[.Bailment. — Locatio Rei.~\</p>
- 5 Tenn. 14Wm. P. Chester v. Executors of John Scott (1817)
<p> ^Injunction against, Judgment at Law.~\ </p>
- 5 Tenn. 19Elizabeth M'elhatton v. Henry Howells. (1817)
<p>\_Husband and Wife. — Wife’s Equity.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 27John G. Ruble v. William Murray (1817)
<p>[ Tender. — Payment of Money into Court. — JSvidence.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 30Massingale v. Hale (1817)
<p>[ Ghiardian and Ward. — Appointment of Guardian. — Contest. — Testamentary Guardian — Removal of.] ,</p>
- 5 Tenn. 35Cook v. Smith (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 36Clark v. Clark (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 43Miles Cunningham v. Banner Shieldss. (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 44Cunningham v. Shields (1817)
<p>[Fraud. — Injury. — Principal and Surety.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 49Martha Howell v. William Whitchurchs. (1817)
<p>[ Wills. — Application for Reprobate. — Certiorari.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 51Huffacre v. Green and the Heirs of M'clary (1817)
<p>[Bill of Review — When granted.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 52Robertson's Heirs v. MacLin's Heirs (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 53Cain v. Butler's Administrators (1817)
<p>[ Chancery Jurisdiction Local.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 53Robertson's Heirs v. Maclin's Heirs (1817)
<p>\_Rehearing. — Bill of Review.~\</p>
- 5 Tenn. 54William Durham v. United States (1817)
<p>[ Jurisdiction of State Courts. — Gertiorarii\</p>
- 5 Tenn. 56Calhoun and Lamotte v. Lillard and Hough (1817)
<p>[Pleading. — Amendment. — Nul Tiel Record. —. Verification. — Surety's Defenses, and how charged for Devastavit. — Plene Administravit. — Process.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 60Andrew Campbell v. John M'iver (1817)
<p>[.Administration. — County Court. — Vendee under Erroneous Judgment. — Taxes. — Presumption as to Location of Land.~\</p> <p>Kote. As to the presumption in favor of the judgment of the County Court that the land lies in the county in which it is taxed, this case is overruled by Anderson v. Patton, 1 Hum. 369; Anderson v. Williams, 10 Yer. 234; Conrad v. Darden, 4 Yer. 307. See McCarrol v. Weeks, 5 Hay. 246; King’s Digest, 397, 3339, 3949, 3950, 11,535, 11,538, 11,539.</p>
- 5 Tenn. 63Haynes v. Wright (1817)
<p>[Arbitration and Award. — Power of Agent. — Verdicts.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 65Love v. M'alister (1817)
<p>\JSscape from Prison. —Liability of Sheriff.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 69Durham v. United States (1817)
<p>[ Certiorari. — History and Object of the Writ.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 73Denton Foute v. John Hill (1817)
<p>[Production of Papers. — Parol Evidence of Contents.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 75Archibald Sloan and Wife v. William Cox (1817)
<p>[.Divorce and Alimony.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 77John Peyton, Sen. v. John Rawlins (1817)
<p>[.Injunction. — Fraud. — Insanity. — Former Judgment.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 81James M'cain v. James Vincent (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 84Moore v. Cooke's Administrators (1817)
<p>[ Covenants. — Defect of Title.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 86Tiel v. Roberts (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 88Butler and Butler v. Peyton (1817)
<p> \Fraud in obtaining Decreed] </p>
- 5 Tenn. 90Wilson v. Carver (1817)
<p>[Mortgage. — Sale with Liberty to Repurchase. — Sale of Equity of Redemption.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 93Henderson's Administrator v. William King (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 94Henderson's Administrator v. King (1817)
<p>. [Plea of Former Judgment. — Merits.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 98Tindall v. Shelby (1817)
<p>[ Change of Venue. — Records. — Transcripts.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 100W. and A. Trigg v. W. and J. Boyce (1817)
<p>[ Gertiorari as Substitute .for Appeal — Grounds for. — Time.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 102Jourdan v. Barry (1817)
<p>[Apprenticeship.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 108Roundtree v. Tibbs (1817)
<p>['Evidence. — Testimony of Incompetent Witness.~\</p>
- 5 Tenn. 109Overton, Assignee of Anderson v. Crabb (1817)
<p>[Amendment. — Pleading. — Verification.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 109State v. Reynolds (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 110State v. Reynolds (1817)
<p>[New Trial. — Twice in Jeopardy.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 111Douglass v. Rawlins (1817)
<p>[l?oads. — What Record must show."]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 112John Edminson v. Baxter and Morell (1817)
<p>[ Garners. — Measure of Damages. — Set-off'.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 115Gordon v. Joslin (1817)
<p> [Principal and Surety.~\ </p>
- 5 Tenn. 120Sappington v. Hill (1817)
<p>\Land Law. — Survey of Entries.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 121Lannum v. Brooks's & Wright's Lessee (1817)
<p>[Ejectment. — Boundary. — Hearsay. — Charge of Court. — Copy of Registered Grant as Evidence.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 124Harris v. Williamson (1817)
<p>\Fraud. — Concealment. — Compensation. — Rescission.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 128John Joseph Long v. William Dooley (1817)
<p>[ Correction of Contracts. — Specific Performance. — Evidence in Courts of Law and Equity.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 134Cartwright v. Cartwright (1817)
<p>[Statute of Limitations. — Legacies and Distributive Shares.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 136William and Mark Mitchell v. Redmond D. Barry (1817)
<p>[Land Law. — Conflict of Mntries. — Notice. — Void Entry. — Buying in Better Title.~\</p>
- 5 Tenn. 143Thomas H. Perkinss. v. Joshua Hadley (1817)
<p>[ Certiorari as Substitute for Appeal. — Merits. — Time. — Damages on Covenant to convey.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 148Eliza C. Perkins v. Joshua Hadley (1817)
<p>[,Specific Performance. — Improvements. — Splitting Actions.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 153Phillip's Lessee v. Robertson (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 154Phillips's Lessee v. Robertson (1817)
<p>[Landlord and Tenant. — Verbal Leases.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 159Hartley v. the Executors of Gains (1817)
<p>[Actions against Representatives. — Pleading Notice of other Del)ts.~\</p>
- 5 Tenn. 161Nelson v. Williams (1817)
<p>[Sheriff. — Money collected on Execution.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 162Den, on the Demise of Pallas Neile v. Ezel (1817)
<p>\Land Law. — Conflict of Entries.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 165Rebecca Renney v. John Mayfield (1817)
<p>[Habeas Corpus. — Slavery.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 170Douling v. Hickman (1817)
<p>[ Trespass. — Plea of IAberum Tenementum. -— Replication.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 174James Berry v. Elisha Waldens (1817)
<p>\_Land Law. — Conflict of JSktries.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 181Samuel Wilson v. Andrew Kilcannons. (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 182Wilson v. Kilcannon (1817)
<p>[Land, Law Limitation.-— Oolor of Title. — Infant Gestui que Trust.' — Statute of £7ses.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 187Charles Graham v. Ira Green (1817)
<p>[Jurisdiction of Justices of the Peace.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 189Smith v. Koontz Others (1817)
<p> [JVe Exeat.'] </p>
- 5 Tenn. 189Young Forgey v. Henderson (1817)
A bill of review was now presented in this cause, which was decided at the last term, and a decree then made. It contained a charge of errors of> the court in * matters of law, in not directing the articles to be returned to Forgey, which had been executed between him and Henderson, and which he had assigned to Young.
- 5 Tenn. 191Cock v. Cummins (1817)
<p>[ Coroner as Sheriff. — Motion against Sheriff. — Money collected on Execution.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 191Waller's Lessee v. Whitesides (1817)
Upon the bill of exceptions and on the assignment of errors this point is made : There was a fi. fa. returnable to a former court, and return stopped by injunction ; and, after the injunction dissolved, it was indorsed thus: Aliased to the ensuing term. The entries upon the docket stated a first execution, and then a second, which was lost or mislaid. But on the trial, the above execution was produced, and the clerk swore that was the fi. fa. on which the lands were sold.
- 5 Tenn. 193Dudley v. Balch Balch (1817)
<p>[Poor Persons. — Gosts.~\</p>
- 5 Tenn. 195Newport v. the Lessee of H. Rowen (1817)
<p>[ Oertiorari. — Diminution of Record.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 196Slatton v. Jonson (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 197Slatton v. Jonson (1817)
<p>[Judicial Attachment — Amendment — Non est inventus — Practice.]</p> <p>A capias issued in this action, and on the docket, at the return term of the capias, an entry was made directing that an alias issue. The alias did not in fact issue, and at the next term a judicial attachment issued.</p>
- 5 Tenn. 200Stuart v. Nelson (1817)
<p>[iSaie of Land. — Covenant against Better Title. —Eviction.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 201Flora v. Rogers (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 202Mayberry v. Jackson (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 202Flora v. Rogers (1817)
<p>[ Amendment— When too late for.~\</p>
- 5 Tenn. 203Mayberry v. Jackson (1817)
Mayberry sold lands to William Blount, he to Jackson, warranting them. The latter called on Mayberry for satisfaction for some interferences and deficiencies, and received $344, and released his right and title to all the lands then paid for. And afterwards May-berry sued him and offered to prove on the trial that part of those interferences and deficiencies did not really exist. He offered parol testimony to establish it.
- 5 Tenn. 203Murray v. Ruble (1817)
The judge charged the jury in the Circuit Court unobjectionably, and now all the evidence on both sides is set out in the bill of exceptions, and the assignment of errors is, that upon a motion for a new trial which was made to him, he ought to have granted the same.
- 5 Tenn. 204Anonymous (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 205James R. Rogers v. E. Waller (1817)
<p>[.Injunction against Judgment at Law. — Illegal Contract. — Landlord and Tenant. ]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 210Love v. White & Cox (1817)
<p>[Accounts. — Settlement. — Limitations.~\</p>
- 5 Tenn. 213White v. Cox (1817)
<p> [Exceptions to Master’s Report.'] </p>
- 5 Tenn. 215Findley v. Abraham Tipton (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 216Findley v. Tipton (1817)
<p>[Bonds. — Suit in Name of Governor. — Judicial Knowledge.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 221State v. Aaron Ingram (1816)
A single.woman charged Ingram on oath before two justices, as the father of a child she was then pregnant with. He was taken and bound by the County Court to perform such orders as the court should make relatively thereto. The woman married a third person before the child was born. He appealed to the Circuit Court, who discharged him from his bond. Upon which there was an' appeal to this court, which was now argued by counsel on both sides.
- 5 Tenn. 222Westmoreland v. Dixon and Shelton (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 223Westmoreland v. Dixon & Shelton (1817)
<p>[ 'Warranty. — Latent Defect.~\</p>
- 5 Tenn. 228Redmond D. Barry v. David Shelby (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 229Barry v. Shelby (1817)
<p>[ Covenant to stand seised. — Waste.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 235Sampson Williams v. Andrew Greer's Adm'rs (1817)
<p>[,Second Gertiorari, — Principal and Surety. — Notice of Suit. — Summary Proceedings.^</p>
- 5 Tenn. 242S. George and W. Henshaw v. J. Lewis, Ch'n., C. (1817)
<p>[Practice. — Oyer. — Variance.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 244Patrick Darby's Lessee v. Anglin and Williams (1817)
<p>[Paying Ward’s Debts. — Guardian ad Litemi]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 250John Payton, Sr. v. William and Abraham Trigg (1817)
<p>[ Variance. —Abatement. — Discontinuance.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 252John M'adams v. William Reney (1817)
<p>[Slander. — Actionable Words.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 255Stephen Anderson v. William Anderson (1817)
<p>[Defective Verdict. — Plea of Set-off. — New Trial.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 256Nichol and Ramsay v. White's Administrator (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 257Nichol v. White's Administrator (1817)
<p>[ Contradictions and Defects in Written Contracts. — Omission of Proferí -— Cure of. — Principal and Surety.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 259Robert Malone's Lessee v. Solomon Deboe (1817)
<p>\LandLaw.— Entries. — New Trial. — •Three Verdicts.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 264Armstreet Stubblefield's Lessee v. William Short (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 265Stubblefield's Lessee v. Short (1817)
<p>\_Land Law. — Survey of Entries.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 271Joshua Dillon v. State (1817)
<p>[ Gosts. — Prosecutors. — Inquisition of Forcible Fntry and Detainer.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 272Wallis Haslip v. State (1817)
- 5 Tenn. 273Haslip v. State (1817)
<p>\_Assault and Battery. — Guilty as to Parti]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 274Alexander M'millan's Heirs v. Joshua Claxton (1817)
<p>[Land Law. — Survey of Entries. — Conflict.']</p>
- 5 Tenn. 279Thomas Kings v. Thomas Traviss (1818)
<p>[Limitation as to Trusts. — Kinds of Notice.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 286Ex Parte Weakly (1818)
<p>[Surveys. — Oompensation.~\</p>
- 5 Tenn. 287Brown v. Bell (1818)
<p>[Gross-Bill— When to he Jiled.^</p>
- 5 Tenn. 289Russel and Allen v. Isaac Lanier (1818)
<p>[Fraudulent Conveyance. — Executor de son Tort.~\</p>
- 5 Tenn. 291Phillips v. Overton (1818)
<p>\Attorney and Client. — Fees. — Mvasive Answer in Chancery.]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 293Thomas Shute v. Harder and Others (1818)
<p> [Executions upon Real Estate.^ </p>
- 5 Tenn. 294Trayner v. Brooks and Trayner (1818)
- 5 Tenn. 295Davis v. Walker (1818)
The bill states, that Pruitt, the half brother of the deceased, during the infancy of the defendants, offered warrants to Davis to be located, and agreed to give him one half ; that he, Davis, passed the warrant through * the commissioner’s office, and located and entered the land, and obtained grants, and caused them to be registered; the contract was not admitted in the answer; it was proved that Pruitt did make the contract and promised to give one half.
- 5 Tenn. 295Trayner v. Brooks (1818)
- 5 Tenn. 296Cobb v. Lanier (1818)
- 5 Tenn. 297Cobb v. Lanier (1818)
<p> \_Executor de son Tort.'} </p>
- 5 Tenn. 299Walters v. M'allister (1818)
<p>[ Tender — Plea of]</p>
- 5 Tenn. 300Weeks v. M'carrel's Lessee (1818)
<p>\_Tax /Shies.]</p>