Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 TEX 512 - James v. Fulcrod

James v. Fulcrod’s Empirical Analysis

1851

Citation profile

88
cited by 88 later decisions
3
states following
August 2014
most recently cited

1 federal appellate · 84 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 88 later decisions — most recently August 2014 · most notably Warner v. Texas P Ry Co (1896), Larrabee v. Porter (1914)

1 federal appellate · 84 state decisions

20018511860187018801890190019101920193019401950196019701980199020002010decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 88 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. ““Any agreement or combination, therefore, the object and effect of which, is to chill the 'sale and stifle competition, is illegal; and no party to the agreement or combination, can. derive benefit from the sale.””
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.