Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 Tex. Civ. App. 226 - Chamberlain v. Showalter

5 Tex. Civ. App. 226 - Chamberlain v. Showalter’s Empirical Analysis

1893

Citation profile

7
cited by 7 later decisions
2
states following
October 1949
most recently cited

7 state decisions

How this case has been cited

Cited by 7 later decisions — most recently October 1949

7 state decisions

40189319001910192019301940decided

Later decisions citing this case, by decade. The current decade is in progress, and our corpus holds fewer opinions from the most recent years, so the latest bars are undercounted — not a real decline.

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 7 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “It is not necessary in respect to this plea that the deed used should have conferred any title; it is simply required to possess the appearance of a valid deed. In such case the execution of the deed need not be proved; otherwise an affidavit of forgery would, in cases where the defendant finds himself unable to prove his deeds, have the effect, not only of defeating his title, but also of depriving him of a title by limitations which accrues to him by virtue of his deed being one that has upon its face the essentials of a conveyance, duly registered”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.