Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 Tex. Ct. App. 422

Jordan v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided July 1, 1879

Court of Appeals of Texas · decided 1879-07-01

Tried below before the Hon. G. W. Grant, County Judge. The judge of the County Court delivered a verbal charge to the jury, over the objections of defendant’s counsel, who excepted at the time, and saved a bill of exceptions, which was duly allowed and certified by the judge.

Decided 1879-07-01

White, J.

¶1Appellant was tried and convicted in the County Court, upon an information, for a misdemeanor. On *423the trial, a bill of exceptions was saved by defendant, and duly allowed and certified as part of the record, showing that the county judge, over objections of defendant, delivered a verbal charge to the jury, and refused to give the written instructions asked in behalf of defendant.

¶2The law is that, 6 ‘ in criminal actions for misdemeanor, the court is not required to charge the jury, except at the request of counsel on either side; but when so requested, shall give or refuse such charges, with or without modification, as are asked, in writing.” Pasc. Dig., art. 3063.

¶3Again: “No verbal charge shall be given in any case whatever, except in cases of misdemeanor, and then only by consent of the parties.” Pasc. Dig., art. 3064.

¶4And again: “ Whenever it appears by the record in any criminal action taken to the Supreme Court upon appeal by the defendant that the instructions given to the jury were verbal (except where so given by consent, in a case of misdemeanor), or that the district judge has departed from any of the eight preceding articles, the judgment shall be reversed, provided it appear by the record that the defendant excepted to the order or action of the court at the time of the trial.” Pasc. Dig., art. 3067. Killman v. The State, 2 Texas Ct. App. 222; Goode v. The State, 2 Texas Ct. App. 520.

¶5Reversed and remanded.

/5/texctapp/422 · .json · Public domain