Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist
← 5 Wash. 2d 398 - Warning v. Warning

5 Wash. 2d 398 - Warning v. Warning’s Empirical Analysis

1940

Citation profile

3
cited by 3 later decisions
2
states following
April 1985
most recently cited

3 state decisions

Relationships

Relies on In re Cave · Lockhart v. Lockhart · Underwood v. Underwood · Theis v. Theis · Nerland v. Nerland

Most-quoted passages

The sentences later courts lift from this opinion, ranked by how many decisions quote each — the parts of the opinion doing the work. These counts are smaller than the citation total above because most of the 3 citing decisions cite the case generally; a passage count includes only decisions quoting that exact language verbatim.

  1. “This is referred to by both of the parties, and is referred to in some of the cases, as permanent alimony. It is permanent in the sense that it continues until there is a change of conditions.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage
  2. “until her remarriage or until the further order of the court.”
    1 later decision quote this exact passage

How this case has been treated — in progress

Whether each later court followed, distinguished, criticized, or overruled this decision. The treatment classification (task #35) runs highest-cited cases first and lights up here as it reaches this one.