Public-domain · open source
OpenJurist

5 W. Va. 436

Arnold v. Welton

West Virginia Supreme Court

Decided July 15, 1872

West Virginia Supreme Court · decided 1872-07-15

<p>where the hill and answer ■were filed before the law of the Code of 1868, the rule of evidence must prevail that the sworn denial in an answer, of a material allegation in the hill, must he overcome hy two witnesses, or by one witness and strong corroborating circumstances.</p>

Cited by 1 later decisions — most recently June 1876

1 state decisions

Good law ✅— No negative treatment on recordhow we know

Decided 1872-07-15

View the full empirical analysis of this case →

Moore J.

¶1This is an appeal from a decree rendered by the Circuit Court of Mineral County, dissolving an injunction order.

¶2The defendants, at the November Rules 1868, filed their joint and separate answers, under oath, to complainant’s bill, denying the material allegations of said bill. As the rule of evidence then stood the sworn denial in an answer Of a material allegation in the bill must be overcome by two witnesses, or by one witness and strong corroborating circumstances. In this case the depositions of the witnesses entirely fail to sustain the allegations of the bill, but in fact sustain the answer of the defendants. No error, therefore, appearing in the decree appealed from, the decree must be affirmed and costs and damages awarded the appellees.

The other judges concurred.

¶3Decree affirmed.

/5/wva/436 · .json · Public domain